Advertisement
www.well.com/~art/s+b42002cm.html
From 4th Qtr 2002 of "Strategy + Business, Karen Stephenson's Quantum Theory of Trust. Aside from the business angle (sometimes one has to put up with this) it is very intriguing.
Here's an excerpt:
From 4th Qtr 2002 of "Strategy + Business, Karen Stephenson's Quantum Theory of Trust. Aside from the business angle (sometimes one has to put up with this) it is very intriguing.
Here's an excerpt:
Companies can analyze, engineer, and elevate their own human networks, says the pioneering social scientist.
Think back to a conversation you had months ago with someone you know well enough to trust, but with whom you haven’t spoken since. Chances are you’ll remember only vague outlines of the exchange. Call the person and raise the same subject again, though, and more likely than not, the two of you will find yourselves picking up where you left off, remembering the details of significance and expanding into new areas.
To Karen Stephenson, a maverick yet influential social network theorist, the association between trust and learning is an instrument of vast, if frequently untapped, organizational power. The act of reconnecting and talking with a trusted colleague generally triggers a resurgence of mutual memory, opening the gates to fresh learning and invention. This phenomenon, Professor Stephenson contends, is just one example of the direct cognitive connection between the amount of trust in an organization and its members’ ability to develop and deploy tacit knowledge together. Because networks of trust release so much cognitive capability, they can (and often do) have far more influence over the fortunes and failures of companies from day to day and year to year than the official hierarchy.
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: An interesting paper
10/13I have seen this allready here on tribe.net. Unfortunately this is mostly propaganda for social networking research - I believe we all here are allready convicted. I even did follow the link to “Network Theory’s New Math" only to find more propaganda.
What I learned from those articles is that the algorithms by Mrs. Stephenson are patented. -
-
Re: An interesting paper
10/13Well, I'm not sure I'm convinced yet, but that is mainly because I'm most interested in the privacy-preserving aspects of the system, rather than putting all my networks out in a published FOAF thing.
Irony, of the patenting tho. Interesting. On the other hand, it was in a business journal. Many of the folks in here are going to AoIR soon. I'm wondering if there will be panels there on some of these topics. Since I can't go to the AoIR conference, I hope y'all will report.
Chris
-